• Suit 08, Smart Bridge Plaza, Utako, Abuja, Nigeria
  • Mon - Fri 8.00 - 16.00. Sunday CLOSED

Author Archives: sppnigeria

COP30: REGIONAL INSTITUTION SHOULD PROVIDE FOCUSED OVERSIGHT TO GUIDE MEMBER STATES IN ACHIEVING CLIMATE RESILIENCE

The Society for Planet and Prosperity (SPP) Project Lead / Senior Policy Analyst, Gboyega Olorunfemi has called for a focused leadership by regional institutions in strengthening Early warning Climate Resilience and Human Mobility Systems in West Africa.

This call was made while speaking at the side event organised by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in collaboration with the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and AGRHYMET Regional Centre at COP30 in Belem, Brazil.
Responding to a question on what ECOWAS Member States are expecting from regional institutions in term of support to integrate climate mobility into national adaptation plans (NAPs) and policies, Mr. Olorunfemi stated that regional bodies need to be intentional and strategic in mainstreaming climate policies across the region by playing a central role which goes beyond acting as advisory bodies, but actively ensuring that national development documents comply with existing regional frameworks, are technically sound, and are designed and used as investable political instruments that can attract project financing for both national and regional growth.

“Regional bodies must be intentional and strategic,” Mr. Olorunfemi said. “They should encourage collaboration among countries, conduct a synthesis of all submitted NAPs to assess integration of Early Warning Systems and climate mobility, and use that analysis to identify gaps.”

Olorunfemi enjoined regional institution to rally technical assistance for member states to drive efficiency and to effectively integrate Measurement and Evaluation mechanism in their respective project implementation.

In reacting to a question on failures of early warning systems on flooding, Olorunfemi emphasised that the Local government leadership be designated and empowered as first responder, the channel of communicating warnings must be improved and ensure it get to the right people in the right form and language.

He further highlights the need for provision of adequate infrastructure for evacuation to designated make shift camps, while encouraging government to build trust with people living in the vulnerable planes through continuous sensitisation and advocacy. “No life is worth losing to flooding when it is avoidable” he said.

With COP30 spotlighting implementation and resilience, the discussion took place in the context of intensifying climate impacts across West Africa, where communities are facing increasing risks of displacement, migration, and loss of livelihoods, with women disproportionately affected due to limited access to early warning information and adaptation resources which continue to constrain evidence-based and equitable responses.

The event which highlighted how integrated early warning and climate mobility systems can drive anticipatory action, enhance cross-border cooperation, and build long-term climate resilience, and the role of regional bodies in coordinating these efforts had in the panel Dr. Raoul Koumane, ECOWAS; Dr. Boubacar Assoumana AGRHYMET; John Baki, Women Environment Programme (WEP); Darius ANKAMAH, Alliance for Youth in Climate Change Action (AYCCA); ECOWAS and was moderated by SODOKIN Komi Elom Claude, IOM.

Matching green industrialization ambitions in Africa and Europe: 3 proposals in the run-up to the AU-EU Summit

On 24-25 November, African and European leaders will meet for the 7th African Union-European Union Summit (AU-EU) in Luanda, Angola. In parallel, private sector representatives will discuss new avenues for investment and cooperation at the AU-EU Business Summit. A lot is happening on both continents with regard to green industrial policies, with a particular appetite for the mobility, minerals and agro-food sectors which are of strategic interest for countries in Africa and Europe. Policy and investment environments are evolving thanks to the ambitious commitments made recently during the 2nd  Africa Climate Summit or within the EU’s Clean Industrial Deal and energy and climate vision. But those commitments are not always aligned, and the global trade war and the race to competitiveness in green sectors are not always playing towards long-term strategic partnerships and positive sum games. This blog post makes 3 proposals to foster such a long-term vision and successful new trade and investment partnership tools which could help Africa and Europe both gain in competitiveness. 

Note: This blog posts builds on discussions facilitated by the Ukama Africa-Europe network during a policy-business dialogue held on 17 October, 2025: “Forging green industrial partnerships between Europe and Africa:new momentum, opportunities and barriers.

Proposal #1: Moving from transactional trade to strategic interdependence

The global demand for Africa’s critical minerals and vast renewable energy resources is soaring, yet this presents an existential risk, i.e. replicating the old extractive model or creating “green enclaves” large-scale projects that generate wealth but remain largely disconnected from local economies and fail to catalyze wider transformation. Africa’s partnerships must therefore target a growing degree of downstream value addition. In this context, increased green industrial activity can be designed to serve both export markets and domestic needs.

Africa could for example export green hydrogen, but a lot of potential sits in further value creation. Green hydrogen can indeed play a key role in high-value, energy-intensive products: green HBI (Hot Briquetted Iron) and green steel are prime examples for export, leveraging Africa’s low-cost renewables to create competitively priced, low-carbon intermediary goods for traditional European industrial sectors; in parallel, green fertilizers for domestic use immediately address a continental challenge, reducing reliance on expensive imports and strengthening food security; and the production of alternative green fuels for transport could soon open new export and domestic bunkering markets.

However, investment and subsequent development at scale will not happen in the absence of viable business cases. For green HBI/steel, viability relies on a durable global cost competitiveness and needs to be underpinned by enabling policy and securing massive, long-term, low-cost power and ensuring predictable off-take agreements with global consumers to de-risk the investment. As for green fertilizers, viability arises when local production results in lower costs and higher predictable availability than import, which–given the global fertilizer market structure and high African import dependency–is a viable near-term prospect.

A strategic approach de-risks investment by linking export revenue with domestic development, ensuring that green growth is genuinely inclusive and creates the thousands of jobs possible in well-structured industrial parks. Africa can become a global green manufacturing hub, but only if policymakers, investors, and industrial leaders embrace a new era of competitive interdependence by building production capacity where it makes most economic, climate, and developmental sense.

Proposal #2: Aligning capital with pan-African initiatives and regional clusters

The ambition of Africa’s Green Industrialization Initiative (AGII) has been solidified by recent commitments at the 2nd Africa Climate Summit (IDDRI, 2025) providing crucial strategic direction for the continent’s green economic shift. This intent was powerfully underlined by African financial institutions, including the African Development Bank and Afreximbank, who signed the cooperation framework, pledging to mobilize over $100 billion for large-scale AGII projects, which could act as a strong signaling mechanism for global investors.

To realize this vision, the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is a key piece of the puzzle, as it transforms Africa into a single, vast market, which is essential for achieving the scale and integration necessary for cluster industrial investment. This allows for the critical shift to invest across the entire value chain, from mine to product. For instance, the Southern Africa EV metals cluster requires integrated investment in mining, refining, and component manufacturing, which the AfCFTA’s unified market helps to sustain. This framework encourages coordinated policies that make these pan-African, full-value-chain projects globally competitive, accelerating the strategic goal of moving beyond simple extraction and into resilient green industry.

AGII’s financial backing signals a clear commitment to building competitive green industrial corridors. International partners are now invited to align their capital with this African-led direction. Purposeful integration into global supply chains and capitalizing on Africa’s inherent potential for climate competitiveness can drive commercially viable investment cases that unlock a globally competitive, sustainable manufacturing base for shared prosperity.

Proposal #3: Facilitating investments and removing trade barriers: new partnership models

Both the AU and the EU advance their respective industrial strategies, and the 7th AU-EU Summit is a timely opportunity to reassess how trade and investment tools can be mobilized to drive clean industrial development while deepening cooperation between the two regions. Aligning domestic policy objectives and economic foreign policy requires moving beyond traditional approaches. This means identifying and removing barriers to trade and investment in clean supply chains while exploring new approaches to international cooperation suited to today’s geopolitical context, where both sides face pressures to decarbonize, diversify supply chains, and attract investment in strategic sectors.

There is already much to build on. In recent years, new partnership models between the EU and African economies have emerged blending traditional trade and investment tools with more targeted, industrial-policy-oriented instruments. The Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement (SIFA) is one example. The first agreement of this kind was concluded between the EU and Angola in 2024 seeking to attract, expand, and retain foreign direct investment (FDI). It blends traditional investment facilitation disciplines—aimed at simplifying administrative procedures, enhancing transparency, and improving predictability for foreign investors—with provisions designed to steer investments towards sustainable development objectives. Although it is too early to assess its impact on investment flows, the SIFA offers a promising framework for a country like Angola, whose economy remains highly dependent on fossil fuels, to attract more diversified and sustainable investment. Building on this experience, the EU is currently negotiating a SIFA with Côte d’Ivoire, with plans to launch negotiations with Egypt, Nigeria and Ghana. The real test will be whether this tool can be flexibly adapted to the very different economic contexts, investment needs, profiles, and domestic priorities of African partners and what kind of investment it ultimately attracts.

Another illustration of merging old and new is the first-ever EU Clean Trade and Investment Partnership (CTIP) with South Africa, expected to be concluded at the G20 Summit in Johannesburg. The CTIP targets higher-value sectors such as electric vehicles (EVs), batteries, green hydrogen, and sustainable aviation fuels, supported by a dedicated Global Gateway investment package, integrating trade, investment, sustainable development, and industrial policy under a single framework. Interestingly, the CTIP has provided a space to rethink rules of origin (ROOs) for EVs, which have long been identified as a barrier to the transition from internal combustion engine vehicles to EVs, as per the European Commission’s ex post evaluation of the EU-SADC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA). With three out of every four vehicles produced in South Africa exported to the EU, current ROOs) —which determine the economic nationality of a product—could prevent EVs from qualifying for preferential zero-tariff treatment, given the reliance on batteries sourced from Asia, which account for a large share of the vehicle’s value. Designing EV-specific ROOs tailored to EU-SADC supply chains could facilitate EV trade while also incentivizing investment in battery manufacturing in both regions. This example illustrates the trade and investment barriers that must be addressed and highlights the need for innovative, context-specific solutions to drive clean industrial development across both regions.

The AU-EU Summit will take place in a complex geopolitical moment marked by shifting priorities and alliances. Green industrialization ambitions must however resonate on both continents. The EU remains Africa’s leading trade (EU-Africa trade flows reached approximately €355 billion in 2024)1, investment, and development partner with recent announcement at the Global Gateway Forum2 to back up the Africa-Europe Green Energy Initiative (AEGEI) launched at the last AU-EU Summit (2022) with an additional €618 million package to scale up renewables in Africa.

In the fast-evolving context of industrial policy initiatives on both continents and the diversification of partnerships and alliances, the three proposals developed above could help anchor partnerships in a longer term and more mutually beneficial vision of competitiveness and prioritize sustainable investments in economic diversification and regional manufacturing hubs.

Building Climate Resilience: The Need to Improve Nigeria’s Building Codes and Policies

As global climate negotiations unfold at COP30 Belem, Brazil, one of the revelations that has caught media attention is that global GHG emissions are still rising and that the world may be headed for a 2.5oc temperature rise by the end of the century.  With the effects of climate change already weighing heavily on us in Nigeria, it has become imperative to factor climate resilience in fabric of every sector. One of the sectors where urgent action is required in Nigeria is the building sector.

Globally, buildings account for 37% of greenhouse gas emissions, consume 40% of the world’s energy, and use 16% of water annually (UNEP, 2024). Cement, the backbone of construction in Nigeria, is responsible for emitting over 11 million tonnes of CO₂ every year, according to UNEP (2023). We also face a housing deficit of over 24 million units, with more than 75% of existing homes classified as substandard by government and industry assessments. This has fueled a sprawling informal construction boom that often overlooks climate resilience, increasing dependence on diesel generators, straining waste management systems, and leaving millions vulnerable to environmental hazards. In 2012, catastrophic floods displaced 2.1 million people and caused an estimated ₦2.6 trillion in damages. Another 600,000 people were displaced during the 2018 floods, underscoring the growing threat of climate-related disasters(UN-Habitat, 2024). Meanwhile, Nigerian cities grow at over 3.5% annually and Nigeria ranks 162 out of 180 countries in the 2022 Environmental Performance Index, a painful reminder that we are falling behind.

The spaces where we live shape how we adapt to climate change. Stronger building codes mean safer homes, fewer lives lost to disasters, and cities that thrive rather than crumble. Nigeria has introduced climate policies such as the NDC pledging 20% unconditional emission reduction and 47% conditional emissions reduction by 2030, the Climate Change Act (2021), the National Building Code, and the Building Energy Efficiency Code (2017). Yet these commitments have not translated to practice. The gap is not one of ambition but a lack of enforcement.

Nigeria’s building regulations exist, but are rarely enforced consistently with implementation heavily impeded and compromised by local politics and corruption. Informal construction remains widespread due to limited technical expertise and weak institutional oversight.

Lagos State exemplifies the complexity of Nigeria’s urban regulatory landscape. Securing a building permit involves navigating 17 distinct procedures over an average of 118 days. Faced with such delays, developers rationally choose to bribe officials for expedited permits or to build informally without permits. These practices undermine code compliance and heighten safety risks. While regulatory agencies have the mandate to inspect and enforce standards, enforcement tends to be reactive rather than preventive, often triggered only after structural failures or public outcry. At its core, this is a governance challenge, not just a technical one.

Yet change is possible. Kenya updated its National Building Code in 2024 to mandate rainwater harvesting, heat mitigation, energy efficiency, and Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure, making climate resilience legally required, not optional. India’s Energy Conservation and Sustainable Building Code establishes tiered compliance levels, allowing developers to choose standards that match their project budgets while maintaining baseline performance. These example are recent, tested, and can apply to Nigeria.

Strengthening codes alone will fail without simultaneously investing in enforcement capacity, institutional integrity, and professional accountability. Research has shown that the issue isn’t a lack of laws, but a failure to enforce them effectively. The gap between Nigeria’s codes and their implementation is not knowledge; it is institutional will that requires action on three fronts: 

First, we must integrate climate resilience into the National Building Code itself. Mandatory provisions must address energy efficiency, water conservation, flood resilience, and embodied carbon with clear standards tied to climate zones, including inclusivity requirements for disabled or vulnerable occupants, ensuring resilience serves all populations, not just the able-bodied. This integration must reflect Nigeria’s actual emissions and vulnerabilities.

Secondly, we need to reform enforcement. Permitting processes must be streamlined to eliminate corruption incentives. Multi-agency coordination must be simplified. Professional oversight must be strengthened with clear liability. Training for building officials must be mandatory. The adoption of transparent online permitting systems can significantly reduce opportunities for corruption by minimizing human discretion and increasing accountability. Critically, state and federal oversight is essential as local authorities alone cannot bear the full weight of enforcement.

Thirdly,  we need to create market incentives that reward excellence. Kenya offers a compelling model by pairing mandatory building standards with voluntary green certification schemes that unlock financing benefits. Nigeria could adopt a similar dual-track approach. Mandatory standards would establish the baseline for compliance, while voluntary certifications would encourage developers to aim higher, offering access to concessional financing, faster permitting, and recognition for sustainable performance.

With 24 million housing units needed and millions more to come, Nigeria faces a transformational opportunity. Each new building is an opportunity to construct smarter, more resilient structures. Enforcing standards sets a precedent, and holding developers accountable strengthens norms. By strengthening and enforcing building codes, construction shifts from national liability to national asset. The benefits are far-reaching: reduced repair costs, healthier living, job creation, innovation in local materials, and greater resilience to climate shocks.

If we fail to act, the costs will be staggering. The cities we build today will shape generations to come. We can settle for incremental tweaks or seize the chance to build lasting resilience. We can treat building codes as bureaucratic hurdles or embrace them as essential tools for public safety and climate adaptation.

The real question facing Nigeria is not whether we can afford to act, but whether we can afford not to.

 

By Ifeoma Adenusi

Society for Planet and Prosperity, Nigeria

Enugu Holds Capacity Building for Teachers and Students on the Use of Climate Education Manual

The Society for Planet and Prosperity (SPP) in collaboration with the office of the first lady of Enugu state and the office of the senior adviser to the governor of Enugu State on Climate Policy and Sustainable Development brought together over 50 students, teachers, and stakeholders at the parliament hall, Enugu state post primary school management board for a one day training on the use of the climate manual that was launched by Enugu state Government in march 2025. 

The manual was co-created by teachers and students and spearheaded by Professor Chukwumerije Okereke, with funding from the University of Bristol, United Kingdom. It was designed to equip students with essential knowledge and practical tools to address climate change.


Speaking at the event, the wife of the governor of Enugu state, Her Excellency Mrs Nkechinyere Mbah, who was represented by the wife of the Honourable Speaker, Enugu State House of Assembly, Mrs Chinyere Ugwu, described the initiative as a great idea coming from the office of the SA to the Governor and encouraged the teachers to champion and sustain the novel initiative in the state

“The role of the teachers is critical in making this process a success to train the students to be climate Ambassadors,” she said.

Similarly, the commissioner for environment Enugu state Prof Sam Ugwu, who was represented by the Director, Department of climate change Enugu state Ministry of Environment Dr Nnamdi Arum, thanked the SA and the office of the first lady for putting up the great initiative which has become an avenue to empower the younger generation on how to be alert to climate change challenges , including the best and most sustainable ways to address climate impacts.

This initiative is a significant step towards empowering our educators and students with the knowledge and skills necessary to understand and address climate change. By equipping them with the tools and resources outlined in the Climate Manual, we can foster a culture of sustainability and environmental stewardship in our schools and communities.” He stated

The Chairman of Enugu state Post primary school management board (PPSMB), Rev. Fr. Dr Hillary Mgbodile thanked the SA and the office of the First Lady for the laudable initiative and also prayed for the sustainability of the project and scale-up of the campaign to other schools in the State.

“I commend the SA and the office of the first lady for this great initiative and urge the staff and students present to take the knowledge home and pass it to their colleagues in their various schools,” he noted.

The director of schools services Enugu State Ministry of Education Mrs Zita Oba who was  represented by Mrs Agbo Nkem, thanked the first lady and the SA’s office for the laudable initiative, and for coming back to fulfil their promise of training the staff and students and also encouraged that this kind gesture be scaled up to all the schools in Enugu state including primary schools to ensure sustainability  

The event covered training from experts on some topics from the climate manual which include: Climate Change evidence and causes, Our Environment and Human Impacts on the Environment, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), Climate Solutions: Renewable Energy, Clean cooking and Climate Change Careers and becoming a green ambassador (Environmental school club).

There were also hands-on training and practical exhibition by the students on how to make briquettes from scratch. Equally demonstrated was how to make an ottoman chair using plastic waste from the environment.

According to SPP, the next stage of the training will involve the establishment of green clubs in secondary schools in Enugu state, with the schools that participated in the one-day training serving as the pilot hubs.


Anieze Ethelbert Elochukwu, Policy Analyst at  Society for Planet and Prosperity

Explaining Katsina’s Massive Leap to 2nd Position in the 2025 Climate Governance Ranking

In 2024, during the first edition of the Subnational Climate Governance Performance Rating and Ranking, Katsina placed 25th with only 64 points. We did not think at that time that such showing was acceptable or representative of the capacity that the State has when it comes to all-round climate action. So, we recalibrated. This year, the State took the second position with an impressive score of 310 points — a 23-place leap that represents one of the fastest governance transformations in Nigeria’s recent history.

This extraordinary turnaround was driven directly by strategically following the benchmarking and performance insights provided through the Subnational Climate Governance Ranking, which gave us a clearer sense of where we stood and what needed to change. The report did not just rank; it guided.

Katsina’s growth in climate governance has been remarkable. The State has carefully sought to improve in all indices and this has reflected in measurable, real-world transformation over the past year. The SCGPR provided a structured mirror that helped us identify institutional weaknesses, budgetary gaps, and implementation deficits — and to fix them in record time.

Much of the credit goes to His Excellency Governor Dikko Umar Radda, whose vision to leverage climate action for development and poverty reduction became the cornerstone of our Katsina Green Growth Agenda. Since adopting this evidence-based approach, over 1.5 million residents across 22 local government areas have directly benefited from improved environmental services, access to solar energy, and enhanced agricultural productivity.

Following insights from the ranking template, we established dedicated climate governance units across 12 ministries and launched coordination mechanisms involving all 34 local governments. This structure, inspired by the SCGPR performance indicators on institutional arrangements, has streamlined decision-making and improved accountability. Today, over 300 civil servants have received climate policy training, and local governments now integrate climate budgeting into their annual plans.

These institutional changes have not only improved coordination but also helped attract external technical assistance worth ₦2.4 billion from national and international partners — investments that are being channelled into rural electrification, waste management, and afforestation.

The passage and implementation of the Katsina State Climate Resilience and Green Economy Policy (2024) marked a new era. Through this policy, we have aligned our goals with Nigeria’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), ensuring climate governance serves as a platform for economic inclusion and social progress.

The target of the new policy is to mobilised over ₦6 billion in green-sector investment and creating 2,000 new jobs in clean energy and sustainable agriculture.

Already, these efforts are yielding tangible socio-economic dividends — 1,800 smallholder farmers have received solar irrigation support, boosting dry-season yields by up to 25%, while reducing dependency on diesel pumps.

We have recorded notable progress in solar mini-grid installations, dry-season farming initiatives, and community-led afforestation drives. The Solar for All initiative has connected over 150 rural schools and health centres to reliable solar power, improving education and healthcare delivery for more than 250,000 people.

Meanwhile, our community tree-planting campaign — inspired by the Ranking’s emphasis on project visibility and citizen engagement — has resulted in the planting of 1.2 million seedlings across the state, reducing desert encroachment and providing economic opportunities for youth and women cooperatives.

These interventions have reduced rural energy poverty, curbed migration pressures, and enhanced household incomes.

Our commitment to climate finance was deepened after the 2024 SCGPR highlighted our weak budgetary framework. In response, the State increased climate-related allocations by 30% in 2025, while introducing provisions for the issuance of Green Bonds. These bonds are projected to raise ₦10 billion over the next three years, earmarked for climate-smart agriculture, flood management, and renewable energy expansion.

We have also launched the Katsina Climate Watch, a digital transparency portal tracking project updates and offering public education on climate issues. Since its inception, the platform has reached over 500,000 residents online and mobilised 10,000 volunteers for community climate projects. This innovation, shaped by the SCGPR’s Online Visibility pillar, has transformed climate awareness from a government agenda into a people’s movement.

The increased visibility and transparency have enhanced citizens’ trust and encouraged collaboration between local government councils, youth groups, and development partners.

Our progress is reflected across the SCGPR’s five thematic areas. Under Climate Institutional Arrangements, Katsina rose from 24 points and the 32nd position in 2024 to 110 points and 2nd position in 2025. In Policy and Legal Frameworks, the State moved from 5 points and 30th position to 50 points and 4th position. For Budgetary Allocation to Climate Change Projects, Katsina advanced from 5 points and 32nd position to 60 points and 2nd position, and under Project Implementation and Monitoring, we rose from 15 to 55 points. Online Visibility also grew from 15 to 35 points.

These are not just numerical improvements — they represent better schools powered by solar, cleaner streets, thriving small businesses, and farmers earning more from climate-smart innovations.

While we celebrate this milestone, we view it as a baseline, not a ceiling. Katsina remains committed to building a sustainable, climate-smart future. We will deepen partnerships with federal institutions, development partners, and civil societies to move from second to first place — not for the title, but for the people whose lives are now demonstrably better because of research-led governance reform.

Kudos must of course go to the Department of Climate Change (Federal Ministry of Environment), Professor Chukwumerije Okereke, the Society for Planet and Prosperity, and all other partners for this brilliant and innovative initiative. This has not only motivated State-level action but has also provided a clear evidence-based pathway to more effective and efficient subnational climate governance.

Under the visionary leadership of the Governor, His Excellency Governor Dikko Umar Radda, Katsina State is determined to maintain and improve on its performance in the third rating and ranking project in 2026.

Professor Mohammed Al-Amin
Special Adviser on Climate Change to the Governor of Katsina State